смотреть видео RAH-66 Comanche

aspartian написал:

Dec 14, 2011 - @wartmcbeighn Just like the F-22 it is more along the lines of "look what we can make" instead of " this is realistic"

SuperErich1980 написал:

Dec 15, 2011 - The f-22 is the real deal.

rezakhalilzada написал:

Dec 17, 2011 - @IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA explain?

IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA написал:

Dec 17, 2011 - @rezakhalilzada the 20mm AAA doesnt need radar(most of the time)and are easy to hide and not even the ka-52,ka-50,hind or apache could escape one of them

borjia1982 написал:

Dec 25, 2011 - ugly and weak

xerxes9408 написал:

Jan 1, 2012 - i think your videos broken... it repeats a couple times

sNiP3R0pTiX написал:

Jan 22, 2012 - @JNT11593 Hey, when does the AHX6V/S go into production? I'm trying to get as many sources as possible.

alohaakbar69 написал:

Feb 1, 2012 - Sorry, this high tech machine was canceled for production.

pixelsmack написал:

Feb 4, 2012 - The Comanche was merely photogenic is all. A great movie prop but it's payload and price were not worth it. It might have been allowed to exist in the Reagan era, but not Clinton/Bush.

GALM1CIPHER93 написал:

Feb 7, 2012 - I heard that when they canceled the Comanche the rest of the money was used for the F/A-22 Raptor is that true?

Povoski516 написал:

Feb 8, 2012 - @dsoutherngent1 It was canceled because of the price, the Longbow Apaches can do just as good a job at a fraction of the price.

Povoski516 написал:

Feb 8, 2012 - @dsoutherngent1 That f-117 was only shot down because they followed the same exact flight path into and out of the area they were bombing day in and day out. The enemy just fired at the area they new it would be when they saw or herd it, and as you know it did eventually work. Stealth tech isn't vulnerable it was poor leadership and mission planing on the part of the Air Force that got that 117 shot down.

dsoutherngent1 написал:

Feb 9, 2012 - @Povoski516 You cannot fire an SA-2 into a black sky with nothing to shoot at, namely a heat signature. The -117 being subsonic, low level, and under-powered, if a trace of it is found, its done for. Once again, proving my point as to why we moved on to aircraft like the B-2, F-22, B-1...all stealthy (B-1 has a very low radar signature) ALL can carry A LOT more payload, have enough speed to get outta trouble, or fly high enough to stay outta trouble. Get it the point yet?

drewniebur написал:

Feb 12, 2012 - that's the Comanche I know and love :)

Crookster100 написал:

Feb 13, 2012 - sure it might be stealth but it gives off a large enough heat signature that it can be seen from 10 miles away if you got thermals.

Franck121169 написал:

Feb 17, 2012 - Sur ''ARTE'' ils avaient passé un documentaire sur le ''Comanche'' encore en prototype et à l'essais.

pyro4002 написал:

Feb 18, 2012 - @SRSpoony I guess you wrote this before they told you that you Brits are on your way out of the world-class military club. It's okay, "sunshine," I don't think we're scheduled to do our "warmongering" in the British Isles for another decade or two. Enjoy the fuck out of that trash-talking before everyone else catches on to the fact that you're a has-been.

SRSpoony написал:

Feb 18, 2012 - @pyro4002 takes 1 brit to kick 50 yanks around the park the sky or the water, we dont rely on tech to do our job we do it the old school way kid, i dont need to trash talk anything, its just plain fact we are better than you will ever be, go back to stealing tech form everybody and then branding it yank tech ;) but its fact the whole world know that you are more finished than anybody.

lasourisaboyante написал:

Feb 18, 2012 - @SRSpoony Yes, stolen tech like the internel. Lasers. Aircraft. Your desperate nationalism is just the largest sign of your inferiority complex. I believe you are British like I believe the moon is made of cheese. Grow up troll you aren't fooling anyone.

lasourisaboyante написал:

Feb 18, 2012 - * typo: Internet

killroy3959 написал:

Feb 19, 2012 - @wartmcbeighn it for scouting and marking targets for gunships.

wartmcbeighn написал:

Feb 19, 2012 - @killroy3959 No matter, the overpriced and pretty useless helicopter now resides in a museum...the new schout helo for the US Army being the Lakota, a Eurocopter Ec-135 derivitive

killroy3959 написал:

Feb 20, 2012 - @wartmcbeighn I'm not arguing with that they should've made it more versatile for the price it is.

pyro4002 написал:

Feb 21, 2012 - @SRSpoony Thanks for the laugh, mate. I do like it when I can start my day on a good note, and reading that last little gem on my phone certainly did that.